Poetry is not perfect, mind you, but it's the absolute best we have in the Python world. Whenever I jump into a new project, switching it to Poetry is one of the first things I do so I have a sane working environment for it.
Poetry is not perfect, mind you, but it's the absolute best we have in the Python world. Whenever I jump into a new project, switching it to Poetry is one of the first things I do so I have a sane working environment for it.
> The only reason to use pip-tools is because you already know it and you don't want to switch (yet).
Actually, I settled on pip-tools _after_ trying Poetry :-)
> pip-tools is squarely worse than using Poetry.
News to me. Like I said in my original comment: "I personally still find Poetry and Pipenv to be a little heavy-handed for my preferred workflows." A tool that gets out of my way and lets me achieve my goals is a better tool for me. Since Poetry can't meet me where I am, pip-tools is better _for me_.
When it works, it's damn near perfect.
When it doesn't work, and that usually involves a problem with a downstream dependency that isn't technically Poetry's fault, it's a massive hassle and sometimes impossible to manually override.
“I prefer pepsi because coke is too sugary.”
“The only reason you should drink Pepsi is if you already have some. It’s a squarely worse drink than coke.”
poetry works well enough but it seems to bring more complexity with it.