Comment by Macha | Hacker News Reader

Comment by Macha | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Are you seriously suggesting that the open source community has not a single idea that is worth considering by Apple?

Anyway, here is gnome 3:

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F...

here is big sur:

https://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/macos-bi...

Let's take a look at one of the most shown off redesigned apps

Here is Mail.app (sierra to catalina):

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F...

Here is Mail.app (Big Sur):

https://i1.wp.com/morrick.me/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/defa...

Here is Gnome's mail app (predates big sur by several years, even in this incarnation):

https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Geary?action=AttachFile&do=get&t...

So, Gnome's design and Apple's didn't exist in a vacuum. I'm not saying Apple told someone to go rip off Gnome 3, or that Gnome 3 is just better than Big Sur in some way. But I think it's altogether too harsh to deny it had any influence when we look at the changes from Catalina to Big Sur.

To me, Big Sur's design is very clearly taking its aesthetics -- for better or worse (maybe better and worse) -- from iOS: minimizing "chrome" as much as possible to the point of making title bars vanish when it's deemed feasible, reducing buttons to flat single-color icons, and so on. Your screenshots of GNOME 3 look more like Catalina than Big Sur to me, honestly; the buttons still look like, well, buttons; the title/toolbar goes all the way across (unlike Big Sur but like Catalina), the buttons are grouped (unlike Big Sur but like Catalina), etc.

I don't think anyone would say design exists in a vacuum, nor that the open source community has no ideas that Apple or other companies would consider -- I mean, look at CUPS and KHTML! But open source has, well, not historically been great with its desktop UX design. The best free software interfaces that I see tend to take pretty direct cues from (hopefully well-designed!) commercial counterparts; more often than not deviations from those established norms make things worse rather than better.

>I mean, look at CUPS and KHTML!

CUPS and KHTML existed far before Apple borrowed them.

> CUPS and KHTML existed far before Apple borrowed them.

That would be why I cited them as examples of open source ideas Apple would consider. :)

I've been looking at the screenshots you've posted and I'm struggling to see what influence you're seeing in Big Sur that came from Gnome 3.

The best I've come up with is the switch from a two row title bar/header to a one that is integrated into just one row. Which could very well be inspired by Gnome 3 or parallel evolution.

Are there other UI elements that I should be seeing in Big Sur that look like they have inspiration, homage, blatant copying that I'm not seeing here?

To my eye they have a somewhat similar aesthetic but and general layout but their differences are many when looking closer.

Graphics are cute, yet when one digs deeper there are no proper frameworks that provide the Feel, only the Look.

This is true. Macos's window management is still a dumpster fire (Cmd-tab to go to the last window raises all windows in that application. And switching to the previous application across two monitors will focus on the application windows in the monitor of the most recently focused window - not the last window).

That's because Cmd-tab switches applications, not windows. Generally macOS doesn't do "window management" it does "application management". Once you start thinking "what application is active" instead of "which window is active" you'll find it pretty natural. Took me about a week of full-time use of decades of Windows/Linux. (Although, admittedly I had used MultiFinder back in the day, so I was already used to the paradigm.)

Calling it a "dumpster fire" is a bit overdoing it when it's just a different paradigm.

I think everyone is aware that it's a different paradigm. It was introduced in the 80s as a way to have floating windows for the application and reuse the same tool windows for e.g. Photoshop without a parent window. But now even Photoshop has a parenting window. Almost everyone just maximises all their applications since Mac window management doesn't work. And everyone else has to install Spectacle or Rectangle[1]

I am attacking the paradigm. It has had its time. It is done. It should leave.

[1] https://github.com/eczarny/spectacle https://github.com/rxhanson/Rectangle

What's the alternative? If cmd-tab switched windows, my own workflow would be a nightmare. The list of all windows when switching would be unmanageably large and I'd have to manually raise several windows after switching.

My preference would be to keep it as is but have window switching work like app switching. The separate order in which the two cycle is a pain.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com