I get you have pages for those words since you are running a dictionary, but do I understand you were running ads for pages with those words specific?
More importantly, the issue is that there’s no recourse in these cases. It’s downright stupid that you can report a dictionary for this and get them permanently banned. If the issue is don’t run ads on naught word pages then google should make this list public and stop ruining businesses by practicing “I’ll know it when I see it” style moderation by algorithmic bots without human oversight.
It's a damn definition, not an article or essay on rape. Facts shouldn't be censored because someone feels it might offend their delicate senses.
I mean it's fine to have those pages. Google also ranks them for those keywords.
But I can understand why a company won't allow someone to specifically run ads on those keywords. Like the above comment about ebay talks about.
I'm not sure whether that happened in this case or not, but that was my question
This is the same problem in a different skin: words to not equal intent. When we only judge by words we restrict good faith information and promote bad faith euphimisms that do real harm.