Oh no, women have one advantage over men (if it were true) in a male dominated field.
How do you not see how contradictory that statement is?
How do you not see how contradictory that statement is?
Out of all possible advantages (let's say 1000 in total) your saying men hold 100% of all these advantages and women can't even hold one advantage?
What in your mind is more realistic?
If you wanna line up your complaints alongside mountains of empirical evidence showing how women are disenfranchised repeatedly feel free, just don't expect people to take you seriously when you call yourself a feminist.
If you actually want to call yourself a legitimate feminist you should spend more time listening and learning. It might make you actually feel silly to complain about how men are treated in tech.
Show me the data for this specific case of horizontal movement in engineering organizations for women and you have an argument that can change my view.
>If you actually want to call yourself a legitimate feminist you should spend more time listening and learning. It might make you actually feel silly to complain about how men are treated in tech.
I am listening and learning. Show me your data. <-- that is literally a call for you to prove your points so that I can "listen and learn"
>I'm saying what's the point of even keeping score when the odds are so stacked against women.
Who's keeping score? I'm just bringing up one specific case of unfair treatment. I never tried to turn this into a battle of "which sex is treated more unfairly"