What Happens When Anonymous Gets A Bank?

I think people misunderstood Jason Calcanis' article. Actually, his article is not so "OMG we're doomed!" at all, as the headline implies. From the article and the video I got that he's actually pro-bitcoin.

When he said it's "the most dangerous open source project" he's ever seen, he meant it in a creative destruction kind of way, which is true. It would disrupt the financial system a lot, but that doesn't necessarily make it a bad thing in the grand scheme of things.

Also, from the way this author writes the article, I get the feeling he doesn't really understand Bitcoin or its purpose. He makes it sound like it would only ever be used by evil-doers, and I don't think that's true at all. Changing the way money are used and changing the status quo is not inherently bad, even though the incumbents in most markets seem to think that when they get disrupted. I'm sure a lot of people think the Internet is bad, too.