Uighurs: 'Credible case' China carrying out genocide
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
Otherwise, we can try to see the evidence for ourselves, via articles and satellite imagery and try to make more sense of the situation.
In this case it’s extremely important to distinguish between credible claims of genocide and the many who would without any basis in evidence be ready to support claims of genocide simply because they’ve seen pictures of mistreated Uighur and feel bad about them. You can’t have international political consequences be based on “I saw pictures on Facebook I don’t like, so China needs to be punished!”
As such I think it’s extremely important when people routed in facts and evidence bring forwards a credible case for what China is doing being classified as genocide.
> As such I think it’s extremely important when people routed in facts and evidence bring forwards a credible case for what China is doing being classified as genocide.
Actually, IIRC, the question here isn't so much about what's happening to the Uighurs, but what the definition of genocide is. Basically: does genocide require physical extermination or not? There are different views on that.
That is the organisation that paid for the Q.C's legal opinion and did the public relations legwork for the article.
There is a distinct aura of propaganda adjacent to this piece.
The legal opinion may nonetheless be valid, and for the record I believe it's entirely possible the treatment of Uighurs might qualify as genocide.
I still think it is useful to consider sources when reading articles like this.
For the record, I upvoted.
So where is this source?
Apart from the Xinjiang issue, the Chinese government has also a quite well-documented recent history of putting individuals into reeducation centers. I don't think this is about hating China anyway but taking on a critical stand towards Chinese (government) policy which is well compatible with an admiration for Chinese culture, if that makes any sense...
From the Genocide Convention of 1948: [0]
> Article II
> In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
> (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
> (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Both (d) [1][2] and (e) [3][4] happen to Uighurs in Xinjiang.
[0] https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-...
[1] https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/01/china-documents-uighur-...
[2] https://apnews.com/article/269b3de1af34e17c1941a514f78d764c
[3] https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/09/ch...
[4] https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/09/15/china-xinjiang-children-...
What does it even mean? China is a huge country, what exactly do you hate - over one billion people, its various countrysides, what?
The Chinese are normal people, like you and me. They work, they have families, they have joys and sorrows the same as we do. The only difference is that they are more controlled by their government and are less free to express what they feel. They have some extraordinary minds, very old and rich culture, and many people I know are truly wonderful and I have some very good friends there.
The Chinese government, though, it's a different monster. But still, I can't understand how one can introduce oneself as "China hater".
Why would an honest judge let themselves be guided by a mere counsel's opinion?
Regarding how the allegations of "genocide" (in contrast to the wider crimes against humanity, I guess) are explained, I think the opinion diminishes the massacres of e.g. the Jews and the Armenians; although I'm pretty sure that it's not a novel use of the word in the opinion.
The coiner of the term genocide also included this in their description of it:
> the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.