> _in conjunction_
Given the decades of research into an electronic sense of smell and the billions of $ it will be worth if we can get a electronic nose, why are we jumping the gun to the other things?
> a sensor to detect molecules for which the mammalian nose has evolved to detect.
This would be a modern marvel and so far impossible. It also wouldn't have to be mammalian, there's no reason to limit it.
> If we have an excitatory pattern, then most AI techniques should be able to detect it easily.
Exactly. I'm not sure why you'd need AI at all. It should just be a look up table.
An electronic nose is a big deal.
We are talking the ability to know what people or vehicles are carrying without a search, tracking people and animals over land, the ability to find every truffle in a field, it should help us create smells like 4D cinema, find pollution in water and air and land, track leaks, cooking, find animal and mineral resources, animal husbandry and medicine.