I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a product here. This does not have the smell of success on it.
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a product here. This does not have the smell of success on it.
"Keyboard is QUERTY". How do you misspell "QWERTY"? Yet I'm hoping they did.
They seem to be hoping for a Pixel Qi style screen (but self-developed?), but describe its reflective mode as: "A non-reflective - a button driven backlight “off” monochrome mode for very low-power use in sunlight"
Confusion between trackpoint and trackball: "track-point ball"
"We're putting blockchain technology in the trackpad"
"Machine learning in the power button"
Another thing that doesn't seem to line up with reality is the idea that they might convince Nvidia to make their stuff FOSS enough to be included in this project.
> While NVIDIA would be technically possibly the best performance choice, issues arise with general attitude towards FOSS compatibilty. In any case we look and listen into NVIDIA and CUDA options, accelerating totally open documentation from NVIDIA's side. Also the NVIDIA's Jetson IoT and AI platform is researched for a compatibility with RISC-V architecture, ISA and FOSS
Uh, surely they don't mean the retro ISA bus, right? :D
On a more serious note if I could build a big (dGPU oriented) open laptop I would put an MXM slot in there, so that existing Radeon cards could be used.
This is almost the most concerning part. They're treating FOSS like it's some kind of standard. It's not. FOSS just means software that is free and open source. Something is, or isn't FOSS. You don't follow some standard to deliver a FOSS product. I also couldn't find a single reference to CERN OSHL anywhere online other than on their website. The closest thing I could find was Out-of-school-hours learning... again, if that's what they meant this is doomed.
There's no "Source" in the name.
The irony is strong.