DigitalOcean user portal loads twenty third-party trackers | Hacker News Reader

DigitalOcean user portal loads twenty third-party trackers

twitter.com

69 pointskimi16 comments

In order to exclude your current customers from your retargeting adverts, you can include the tracking inside your app and then exclude from your audience on FB, Google, Quora etc anyone that has visited logged in URLs.

That way you’re only spending money retargeting website visitors who aren’t already customers.

We do this at Paiger for this very reason, and I imagine DO is the same.

Edit:

20 is extreme though.

Couldn't just upload email/username hashes to the platform? I believe Facebook lookalike audiences work this way. I'm sure it can be automated.

In B2B, users don’t have the same email for Facebook usually.

The automated 'please open a ticket' response is hilarious. We need to start calling behaviour like this out - or just blackhole these DNS servers.

Its the equivalent of "open a pull request" when you dont care, and know the other person doesnt care enough to do anything about it.

I've had a really unpleasant experience with DO a few years ago. A full ticket of 5+ mails and each one of them felt like it was picked from a list after reading a couple keywords from my issue. They did of course not solve the problem in the end, but not before someone actually replied not understanding the context at all (can't blame them) and using a condescending tone to me.

I've just logged in to my DigitalOcean account and, while Privacy Badger does block a load of connections, I don't see any for Google Ads or Facebook. Most of the ones I do see are for CDNs.

Just did the same, and likewise here. I wonder if it's just a product of A/B testing or, more alarmingly, that person has malware injecting ads into any websites they browse which then Privacy Badger proceeds to block.

Don't think so. The list looks pretty legit (was posted separately).

Are you in the EU by any chance? Just wondering if it’s a GDPR thing

CDNs are server side trackers. Even when not serving up browser side tracking code that makes yet more requests (which they often do), they're collecting location and other data based on response times and headers. Google's gv2 beacons, newrelic, cloudflare, etc.

This is why tools like decrentral-eyes exists. Unfortunately, tools like actually introduce additional unique identifiers.

Even with Javascript disabled, web fonts are tracking you. Even with javascript and web fonts disabled, images and CSS are tracking you. Even first-party images and CSS track you, even over VPNs and Tor.

First class web experiences that can't track are only possible by routing all traffic through a trusted remote privacy-by-design pre-caching hash table, like via a trusted IPFS node. Then you also need to only transact with the non-web (e.g. server hosting) service over a routeless protocol.

The latter requires the service to support non-custodial routeless protocols for payment and control. This is something dApps do well.

It sounds complicated, but every Web3.0 (not to be confused with Web3.js) service already supports this by necessity, even in outdated browsers, simply by choosing a trusted node and updating your browser or device's DNS and proxy settings. No additional software required.

Wow, super bone headed response. Please open a support ticket? Go to hell, just stop tracking your business customers!

How many times are Digital Ocean going to make the same stupid mistakes when being called out over outrageous behaviour?

They aren’t the biggest player in town and if they continue doing this sort of shit, it will always remain this way.

It always amazes me that 40+% of my traffic is being blocked via Pi-Hole. Then there is still ublock origin on top of that. Most of it is trackers (vs ads).

Only twenty? Look at Bluehost lol...

Not using an ad blocker and complaining about this is like not using a condom and complaining about an itchy crotch.

You shouldn't need an ad blocker to get acceptable behavior, especially when you're already paying the company in question.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com