FOSDEM 2021
fosdem.org
fosdem.org
I always meant to actually attend. Now I can, easily, online. So no excuses.
A lot of the fun is in the hallway conversations etc though, so would still recommend attending if you can at some point in the future
I look forward to it; next year is plausible, now that we're manufacturing vaccines.
You can find FOSDEM 2020 recordings on Youtube[0]. Despite my misgivings about Google, I certainly do use their product for this. Youtube is insanely good for teeing up technical talks to watch.
[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bagFAfFVruY&list=PL_QKjHDgmN...
I also do not want it to become an "industry event" in that sense, I enjoy it 10x more than I do the bajillion Kubecons. I was also referring to not just FOSDEM, but there's PostgresConf/Open, USENIX, OpenZFS, InfoQ, JSConf, Strange Loop -- there is so much information out there that it's exhausting but absolutely to our benefit.
As companies go through their possibly short-lived tryst with true open source (before everyone starts reverting to shareware), they are sharing big ambitious projects that they're working on, and giving interesting talks on the architecture, motivations, etc.
TinyML Asia 2020 was wonderfully executed virtually. The amount of truly breakthrough research and development offered is astounding! It is also quite possible to make connections and discuss people's work and ideas post fact much more easily nowadays. I must say the Q&A feature works quite well in a videoconference setting. Everyone can see the questions - there is no chance of them being misheard.
For smaller settings a live (virtual) discussion is also remarkably workable and useful. Never thought I could easily chitchat with one of the authors of the Agile manifesto, or of the head of the largest LoRaWAN network in the world, etc...
Excited for TinyML Summit 2021!!
That is more than just fluffy talk. I believe FOSDEM to currently be fairly well positioned to keep that focus:
- I like to hope/think FOSDEM's financial situation is close to an optimum: healthy enough to guarantee our editorial independence, but not interesting enough to attract vultures sophisticated enough to distract us from our goal.
- Our formal structure should shield us from takeover attempts fairly well.
- I have every reason trust my fellow board members. We are individuals with alternatives. We actively choose to convert part of our energy into volunteering for FOSDEM instead of into money in our bank accounts.
- We have a physical allergy to tech marketing rear end talk.
- Each of us can tap into an incredibly talented and powerful pool of community allies.
- We actually try to look at opportunities and pitfalls now and then. That probably distiguishes us from >95% of all organisations.
https://matrix.org/blog/2021/01/04/taking-fosdem-online-via-...
* https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/matrix_communities/
* https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/jitsi_scaling/
* https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/vircadia/"miniKanren: a minimal declarative language for relational programming"
PostgreSQL- Lots of Update.
Containers - Running Linux container on Darwin / macOS.
I find it funny, that The most interesting section for me is actually RetroComputing! Ada, Germini, DOS, 68K Mac, ZX Spectrum.
Here is her e-commerce shop: https://shop.printableprompts.com
If you are in the market to sell digital downloads check the platform I'm building: https://www.makepostsell.com
Open source has lots of efforts and bringong more attention to Open Office (or Libre office) is a great idea.
What parent means is OpenOffice is barely maintained (or no effort is put), not that it's worthless.
They also imply that LibreOffice is where the action is, and is better maintained with a bigger community.
I don't follow the projects to know if that's the case, but that's what the parent seems to mean, not that OpenOffice is not usable.
Go, Kotlin, Zig, Python, JavaScript have devrooms.
It seems there is one Rust talk in the Mozilla room. But this is way less than for the other languages.
I wonder why Rust is somewhat underrepresented at FOSDEM. Or maybe my view is totally biased from reading too much HN...
Despite, now that Mozilla does not maintain Rust anymore, I think this really should get a separate devroom.
Edit: Downvote? Why? What is controversial about what I said? Really curious. That Rust should get a separate devroom? Not relevant enough? But this is even what I considered in the sentence before.
Or are there more Rust talks and I didn't found them? Actually, there seem to be some more, but still less than for other languages: https://fosdem.org/2021/search/?q=rust
If the is no Rust room, it seems that nobody from the Rust community saw need to hold these kinds of gatherings. So maybe an item for your to-do list to push for next year. (And as others have said in this thread: previously it was part of Mozilla and given Mozilla's change of priorities recently, I assume they stepped back)
We announced it here a while ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/j03i80/fosdem_2021_on...
We were encouraging others to fill the gap if they wanted but no one really stepped up so... ;) I hope that next year we'll be back in person.
Does that change how people will perceive the conference?
* Lighting talks/short talks: Most of the time, you may not have Q/A if the speaker talks too long but you can catch they off stage to talk about it. So you keep the live aspect.
* Big/Popular talks/Main roam (Janson): You don't ask Q/A during those presentations so it would not change a lot.
* Mid-sized talks/roams: It depends on the speaker how much interaction, he wants.
* Tiny roams: There you will loose the jokes and the fun going on with well-know speakers in their communities.
I think we will see less informal/fun talks because the streaming format does not easily allow the spur of the moment joke/question. The quality of the speaker will really during those Q/A moments but on a time management side, the good news is that you have less time-keeping to do with a prerecorded streaming event if each talks has his channel.
For the ccc conference rc3, linus said something in direction of 'lets not do that again'.
At least for me, i go to Fosdem for all the talks of course but also to see people, dring belgien beer, eat, freeze, have wet shoes and enjoy the sun on the second day for 1-2 hours.
Perhaps a "simple web mode" would be the better solution... a proxy that strips away the unwanted parts.
I don't think that's supported. Gemini is more about providing an ultra-lightweight alternative to 'Web 1.0'. It's more at the level of the man page format, [0] or markdown, than HTML.
I imagine they might want a way to provide access-control, but I doubt they'd be interested in implementing read/write features.
> Can't indicate your preferred languages either.
Looking at the spec, I think you can. [1]
> Perhaps a "simple web mode" would be the better solution... a proxy that strips away the unwanted parts.
Don't we have that with Reader Mode and Outline.com?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_page#Formatting
[1] https://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/specification.html