There are many comments on previous HN threads defending censorship and information restriction, precisely as the GP has described it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25693742
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25691631
There are many comments on previous HN threads defending censorship and information restriction, precisely as the GP has described it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25693742
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25691631
Rather the contrary. Anyway, by my tautological definition of hacker, no hacker would be in favor of banning a communication app, anyway, so ...
Would you also say that tech companies banning ISIS is systematically oppressing members of one religion?
> that's the antithesis of free speech
It’s not. Companies enjoy freedom of speech too, but you’d force them to publish content they don’t want to publish. That’s the antithesis of free speech.
Amazon, Apple, Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc. are multibillion-dollar corporations that control a colossal share of online communications.
Let's not play pretend here.