But, point me to a single ISP that gives a cable subscriber more than one IPv6 address. or a /48 as initially everyone was hopping.
ISP profit from NAT. They will never get rid of it. Even if you get a /54 /64 the ad networks will just learn to assign /54 as they do today.
But, another point, ipv4 today is barred from being used to form your advertising profile under current legislation.
My computer rotates out IPv6 addresses every 30 minutes using SLAAC with privacy addresses.
While you can identify the /64, there is no guarantee that it is a single user, just like in IPv4 because of NAT there is no guarantee it is a single user. It'll identity a household, but that's it.
is the key concept I am talking about here and everyone keep saying it is not.
Just like ipv4 is what matter and why ISP will never kill NAT. They profit from it, somehow. and it is not just saving money on ipv4 address space.
https://support.aa.net.uk/IPv6
"Customers are allocated a /48 block of addresses - this is usually per customer, and so a customer with multiple circuits or sites will have a /64 allocated from the larger /48 block"