Hacker News Reader

> The Nano foundation got 7M/133M = 5% of the initial coins for a "developer found". Did they spend/distribute all of it or it is still saved?

> Miners will get 2.4M/21.0M, that is a 11% inflation. And they have to spend most of it in the mining. Just call this 11% a developer found, and the difference is not so much.

I don't understand your point please elaborate more on your point, thanks!

> I still don't understand how is Nano protected of double spending without PoW or PoS or centralization.

Attack-vectors: https://docs.nano.org/protocol-design/attack-vectors/

> It's very easy to fix. Just increase the maximum block size. There is a fork that does that and a fork that use smaller transactions in a secondary chain.

A fork is not a feasible solution who knows if this fork get's ever merged into the master branch of bitcoin

This is precisely what happened in 2017 in the "Bitcoin" vs "Bitcoin Cash" fork https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Cash One part of the community used one fork and the other part of the community used the other fork. Both solutions increase the tps.

hi, found something that might address some of the concerns regarding nano. it's like q&a that someone has compilled regarding comlon nano challengesnor criticisms.

http://nanofud.com/

another community created information https://github.com/georgehara/nano/wiki/unofficial