AAA wants us to stop calling car crashes “accidents”
capitolfax.com
capitolfax.com
I remember when AAA offered a host of services. I could call them and they would call hotels on my behalf to inquire if there were pet-free rooms, for example. They're a skeleton shell of their former self, it's a real shame.
Most people book their hotels and flights online, and not by calling an agent. No one needs a trip tic, they have google maps and a host of other on demand guides in their pockets. There’s no way Aaa could provide it’s old services in a cost effective way when there would be so little demand.
Nothing you've said is correct. The insurance industry doesn't determine fault based on minute linguistic decisions like this.
This change is mostly driven by public health and govt orgs.
I get where AAA is coming from, if we were more careful, fewer people would die. They aren’t dying in droves because unexpected gusts of wind are pushing you through red lights, they’re dying because you won’t put down the phone.
In the US, the claims adjuster determines who is at fault. The police report is weighted more heavily than anything either party says, as is physicak evidence of the collision.
If there's a disagreement, most insurers will go through a special arbitration process. Whether one of thr parties says "accident" or "collision" is not one of the factora considered.
Accident it is. I won’t be language policed by an insurance industry mouthpiece like AAA, that’s for sure.
They do? Whose? And when? I'll confess I have very little experience in this area.
I'd imagine that only happens when the people involved in the accident want to go after an insurance company for denying a claim or not paying the full agreed upon amount. In fact the only time I've ever heard of it in my life was when my ex sued the insurance company for trying to get away with covering less than 10% of her medical bills following an accident that had totaled both cars and left the at-fault driver dead.
I don't think lawyers are common in most trivial accidents- I don't know how accurate it is to say that lawyers often get involved.
I think you’ve got it backwards. The point is don’t call it an accident, because that implies no fault, and instead call it an incident or collision or similar that implies nothing.
You call it an accident up front, and then you try to get damages from for example the car manufacturer because you find out the car was faulty... no wait a minute you can't do that because you already declared you think it was an 'accident'.
Going forward, though, they need to put the idea into action at the local, state, and federal levels when transpo policy and funding discussions are held. Language means nothing if automobiles continue to rule the road.