Gold standard? They have not been previously used on us humans and there are far more side-effects w/mRNA than traditional vaccines. I'll take J&J's '66%' over any mRNA vaccine.
After all, these vaccines do not prevent the virus directly, they're just there to coax the body to produce new things. Both teach the body about the spike protein. It does seem like the mRNA vaccines are given a not-yet-due congratulations on every medium I see yet mRNA vaccines have absolutely zero history of pandemic ending at this time. Yes that may change, but to call them a gold standard now that's just not accurate.
Looking at that comment it might be because it just asserts “there are far more side-effects w/mRNA than traditional vaccines” without any explanation or sources.
The numbers of allergic reaction are different for Moderna and Pfizer. If you have a history of allergies you should consult your allergist for advice.
The above numbers are public, but I'm not sure where I read them. As always I'm just a guy on the internet, if you need medical advice see a doctor.
You don’t get to make claims and then require someone else to provide data to disprove them. If you make the claim you have to provide the data yourself.
Please list those. Should be easy as you claim there's so many of them. Also please prove how often those many side effects occur. Thank you.