You are right, but she is a GCP ML advocate, so her job is to distill this stuff down into blog posts or 45 minute talk tracks.

I normally agree, but this is clearly just for fun and for poking around with cloud tools. The author is not making claims about accuracy or anything, I think this post is not a good one for the stampede of “well actually...” ML approach bashing of HN. This is a nice post.

In my mind it stands in contrast to the SMART stats hard drive failure model post from a few days ago - that was an inappropriate approach AND the person was putting forward as actually being a valid analysis workflow & conclusion.

This post is obviously just for giggles, and it’s very good.

My thoughts exactly. A DL for 100 row dataset seems like overkill (and likely overfits).

But tensorflow go brrrr

Agree no need for DL for this. Far more efficient models for this kind of use exist.

How would you go about creating something that could generate recipes (e.g. generate me a cookie recipe)?