I wonder why this person thinks that we were created in perfection. Even the bible points out this is far from the truth. Just sayin'
Now, the secondary purpose is to provide some amusing snark: Anything that would "design" such a thing would be anything but "intelligent".
The bible really has nothing to do with this.
The bible has a lot to do with that since it's a standard upon which (at least for the most part in America) the idea of God is derived from.
Seems like a lot of people don't even know what they don't believe in so they make it up.
Because it's not relevant. The entire epistemic concept of a "Creator" who is supernatural is nonsensical, and without any superior merit to any other meaningless hypothesis.
It's not like you seek out worshipers of Thor to find out why they believe that. Your hypocrisy in expecting people to listen to you would be comical if it weren't annoying.
Rewind a bit.
Do you know what epistemology is? If you do, then you know why the answer to the question doesn't change from one religion/holy book to the next and you're just trolling.
If you don't, you're just wasting both our time when you should be reading. MIT OCW isn't a bad place to start. Nietzsche's various works (Beyond Good & Evil, Twilight of the Idols, Antichrist, etc) are also good.
Also, do you know what the bible says about the Greeks and their knowledge? Because if you don't then you're just wasting our time. ;-)
You are making a very uneducated presumption by clumping these gods together. How very unscientific.
How am i expecting people to listen to me? WTF? Because I posted one post on this thread? I'm not the person writing a blog and claiming that I know there is no God.
I know first hand just how useless college education is, along with those books. Which to be honest, I've only skimmed through a few.
I honestly can't get past the self-righteous bullshit that those people assume. I just can't stand when they make simple mistakes regarding the texts they're arguing against. I hate it how they assume their conclusions are better than the conclusions of thousands of years of accumulated texts. I hate it how it's being taught to even dumber people who can't get past the bullshit. And I hate it because I'm forced to read them to find out the dumb shit people believe in.
If I learned anything in school is this: humans are stupid.
There has been few if any scientific truths achieved by a man that have stood the test of time. I would never rely on their conclusions for anything. (Much less any conclusions from a silly philosopher.)
(Sorry for the rant, I've just recently been forced to read stuff from Joseph Campbell and I'm still annoyed by it. Even though he makes an occasional good point or gives me an idea, he's still an idiot.)
>I know first hand just how useless college education is, along with those books. Which to be honest, I've only skimmed through a few.
:\
You don't know what science is, and you don't value knowledge.
>There has been few if any scientific truths achieved by a man that have stood the test of time.
You definitely don't understand science. It's about process, methodology, testability, and continually expanding, refining, and testing our understanding of the universe.
A superior method to "making shit up".
Genesis 1:27: So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
That certainly sounds like we should be perfect in body. Unless you want to argue that the Fall rerouted the vagus nerve.
Anyway, you asked why some people might think humans are perfect, and wnoise answered why some people who read the bible might reasonably make that assumption. What exactly is your continued issue here?
Well, I mean they are looking for fact in a thousands year old collection of fairy tales by assorted authors, but they're not particularly any more willingly lazy or stupid...
It also mentioned unicorns...