A) SEC should remove the option of "without admitting or denying" this time
B) The CEO is choosing to speak in double speak because anything he says will violate the antifraud provisions after already being slapped for violating the antifraud provisions. (isn't the point of a law for the punishment to be a little more than agreeing not the violate the law? circular civil suit that should have been referred to the DOJ)
C) Refer current actions to the DOJ and this prior settlement that was violated.
The mere existence of the prior action makes them cannon fodder. Hit them.
If they did restricted selling it would be “fair” but it would be illegal because only regulators can halt sales.
I think outside of specific sanction any resulting regulation should be a comprehensive restriction on payment for order flow, as part of the already ongoing populist trend of valuing data and considering it users property with its own property protections.