42.zip: A single 42,374-byte zip file that uncompresses to one million 4.5GB files (4.5PB)
unforgettable.dk
unforgettable.dk
42.zip > lib {0-f}.zip > book {0-f}.zip -> chapter {0-f}.zip -> doc {0-f}.zip -> page {0-f}.zip -> 0.dll
where {0-f} should be expanded to 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f
and 0.dll is a 4GB file
$ head -c 1000 0.dll |od -c
0000000 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252
*
0001740 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252
0001750
or loads of <AA>'s when viewed in less.
Edit: tried it, GMail refuses the attachement, as the file contains an "executable" file. They took the easy way. Can't blame them though.
while 1
output "\x00"
Just few bytes for infinite effects :)I guess that given the context it's a shame I can't share this article of mine: http://antirez.com/post/87 because it's in italian language but maybe there are more people able to read italian than I hope here.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.compression/browse_threa...
but call me up when you can archive information into thin air, such that the data can be smaller than the smallest self contained equivalent. there some ways to do this. for example, "the first million digits of pi" is a very concise way of referring to a number with a million digits. and pi doesn't have to be stored anywhere, it can always be calculated. so the information is compressed to pi[0..10^6] plus the overhead of the algorithm for calculating digits of pi. since the algorithm would be of constant size, there would be a threshold (likely less than 10^6) after which this approach would be more spacewise efficient than a self contained zip.
too bad there isn't an easily recognizable off-the-shelf constant for every million digit number one would want to compress. pi is transcendental, so EVERYTHING is theoretically in it, but it's tough to find anything in particular and, if you do, it's going to be REALLY deep. and referencing something at a random location deep in pi would probably take no less space than the original data we're compressing.
i wish there was something like that, though. it wouldn't be practical, but... for theory's sake.
DEFLATE is a way improved run-length encoding. Nothing productive though here... :)
YC admin should remove this post immediately.