Too rude for Facebook: the ban on Britain's historic place names
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
After all, the Scunthorpe Problem is not new.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem
The UK has many places with riské names by modern standards: there's a Faggot in Northumberland, a Fingringhoe in Essex, a Bitchfield in Lincolnshire, and so on.
Until recently there were a lot of roads in the UK called "Gropecunt Lane", and I think there are still a few of them left. The name really is rude: no alternative meaning of "grope" or "cunt" is involved. But it was also the official name.
What lovely irony if so.
They have identified (nearly) everyone, living or dead. Going so far as creating shadow profiles for anyone without an account.
There are multiple geographical databases.
Why is this still a problem?
FB are concerned about the quality of the data they are selling to their customers, if they sell a batch of records / API requests and disproportionate amounts of them have birth places that are small villages with ridiculous names, the value of that data decreases.