WSB Went Private on Reddit
reddit.com
reddit.com
Edit: is the current submission a dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25868680? Sounds like the same story but 5 days was a long time ago.
if the stock is at $20
and you think it will go to $10
you can sell the stock at $20 (even if you actually don't own the stock, and never actually gave the buyer the stock, it's more like a promise that you will deliver the stock at some point)
so now you've pocketed $20 and you're waiting for the stock to go down to $10
then, you can buy it for $10 and deliver the stock
since you got paid $20, but you only paid $10 for the stock, you've made $10
this is called shorting
people have been shorting to the point the number of stocks that are promised to be delivered is 140% of the actual number of stocks
this means that, when those who promised to deliver stocks are actually called in to deliver the stocks they already sold for $20 (or whatever price they shorted at)
they need to buy up 140% of the stocks in existence
needless to say, there are not enough stocks to enable them to cover their shorts
and this creates an insane spiral positive feedback loop in the price
none of it has anything to do with fundamentals of the business, their dividends, balance sheets etc
it's purely an artifact of a quirk state the stock has gotten into
the funny thing is it's dumb retail investors who spotted it and kind of all jumped on in at the same time
we like the stock!
if and when the shorters are truly called in on their promises to deliver the stocks they shorted
they will have to fight over an extremely limited supply of stocks, due to the nature of them having sold 140% of the stocks in existence AND us retail investors who have vacuumed up what little was for sale anyway (only a fraction of all stocks in existence are ever up for sale in the first place, so think of it like us vacuuming them all up and leaving them in a position where they have to deliver 140% of the stocks in existence when only a few percent of them are for sale
= lol
What I don't get is the memes. WSB has millions of subscribers and appears to be a combination of a weird nihilistic wasteland, populist anger, memes and jokes, and a few people getting rich. What the heck is that?
I agree /r/wallstreetbets is hard to grasp :P I'm just along for the ride
They definitely feel let down with what Discord has done though and seeking help from the community.
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6j4r9/wher...
Hedge funds are losing at their own game with their own rules, and trying to find other ways to win.
It's still early days but I was recently looking into decentralized web-hosting through IPFS / ENS and it's definitely maturing. I think we'll be seeing more decentralized services in the next year or two.
We are experiencing technical difficulties based on unprecedented scale as a
result of the newfound interest in WSB. We are unable to ensure Reddit's content
policy and the WSB rules are enforceable without a technology platform that can
support automation of this enforcement. WSB will be back.Just one more example why decentralization is actually the future of all content/social platforms. Centralization of control just reinforces existing control/choke points trying to keep entrenched in power in the name of guidelines.
It even includes mining for new posts which is a simple yet surprisingly effective way to limit people's willingness to sock puppet.
Truly. In this case it remains to be seen if they can get back online, apparently it's happened before.
If they don't come back before market open $GME, $AMC, $BB all go caput tomorrow. The community will panic sell without a place to unify.
I'm sure some of the mods are probably thinking about taking their sub the fediverse... this is definitely a sub ripe for breaking out of reddit into it's own thing...
I feel like there's something better coming though. I feel like something's missing from activepub/federation.
I don't know if it's something to make censorship harder, or make privacy better, or for better identity.
Something though is missing. Maybe there needs to be a centralized "identity" and accounts can be "verified" like on twitter and you'd use @user instead of @user@server.com
This way you also could have less chance of impersonation. That's something that I really wonder about... I mean Obama could have an account on one site, and I could create an account with same name on another server masquerading as him, and who'd know which one's authentic?
Sure, if you don't care about celebrity insights that's great, but celebs actually do reply on twitter and that's one of the "draws" being able to possibly interact with someone famous who could make you "famous for a minute".
I think anyone who wants should be able to verify themselves. Whether you are a celebrity or you just think you are because you have 14k twitter followers (grumble grumble).
If you become famous overnight, you're already have a verified identity for PR, etc.
So, I think centralized one-identity that you can control makes a lot of sense and maybe you can always have a kill-switch to set your profile private, or delete/wipe the data and control your own privacy.
But yeah tomorrow is going to be fun to follow this, when the real squeeze kicks in.
Would it be possible to target specific financial institutions in the market to cause volatility and or a crash? A sort of social media driven financial weapon.
> Today, we decided to remove the server and its owner from Discord for continuing to allow hateful and discriminatory content after repeated warnings.
> To be clear, we did not ban this server due to financial fraud related to GameStop or other stocks.
https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/27/22253251/discord-bans-the...
What are you insinuating?