Buckminster Fuller on a long thin wire
library.stanford.edu
library.stanford.edu
I’d be very interested to listen to more of these recordings. But this:
“The Fuller wire recordings can now be streamed in the Special Collections reading room at Green Library.”
You mean to tell me I’ve got to physically go to a library at Stanford to listen to this? Even the sample audio is an unlisted video. That YouTube channel doesn’t have the rest of the recordings. Disappointing. Perhaps I am misunderstanding but it seems the preservation was funded by a donor yet Stanford is keeping the recordings for those with the privilege to listen on site. Is that correct?
At the same time, he clearly held many political positions which were much more controversial in his era, but that the left-libertarian-leaning HN crowd wouldn't find objectionable, whatever their status in the 2021 Overton window: staunchly anti-war, anti-corporate [0], and openly pursuing a post-scarcity utopia [1].
[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/285349.Grunch_of_Giants
[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1321401.Utopia_or_Oblivi...
https://music.washington.edu/magnetic-wire-recordings
"But the input circuit would have to be designed to take the exact level and impedance that was generated by the original head, and there would have to be a recalculation of what the original equalization curve of wire recording was. It probably would not work with a stock amplifier--Theoretically it would be best to rebuild a new amplifier to get the lowest noise specs, but if you only have a small number of wires to dub then it would be an expensive exercise for just a few items. With dozens or hundreds of wires it might be worthwhile. The old amps from those machines were very noisy, and are much worse now that their parts have aged so much."
Doing this purely digitally might of cause be easier these days.
see also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIAA_equalization#The_RIAA_cur...
I would humbly advocate pushing through regardless, as I found the material to be profound; I'd also suggest "Synergetics" [0], which employs a similar style, but is much more STEM-oriented than the "Spaceship Earth" quasi-narrative. But having said that, I don't blame anyone who finds the style too tedious; I have a similar experience every time I try to read 18th/19th-century political economy (Smith + Marx).
[0] https://www.brainpickings.org/2013/03/08/buckminster-fuller-...
I love how in the beginning of Synergetics he spends pages building an argument to justify the statement "1 + 1 = 4." He was insistent that we reformulate our most basic notions about value and equivalence.