I'm under the impression his work is closer to the "radio protocol" than the infrastructure management behind. Not sure if they are related to Open-RAN though...
I'm under the impression his work is closer to the "radio protocol" than the infrastructure management behind. Not sure if they are related to Open-RAN though...
The "radio protocol" is "open" since GSM, anyone can download standards from 3GPP and implement it accordingly. But the mere amount of knowledge and specialized hardware required to do this, even for single layer like L1, is tremendous. I think this is the real reason why we don't already have open-source implementation of the full stack.
EDIT: an afterthought - maybe the O-RAN is really a chance for open-source here. In the future, once O-RAN is accepted and widely deployed, we could work on implementing the stack piece-by-piece, layer-by-layer, filling the gaps with commercial software/hardware as we go, instead of doing everything at once...
Nokia thinks it is in good shape because without Huawei there is indeed not many threats. Starting from scratch is hugely costly and takes many years. In any case Nokia has no choice but to be "committed" to Open RAN since that's what telcos want.
IMHO, Open RAN is a push by telcos to commoditize the infrastructure and to avoid being locked in because key interfaces are proprietary.
Most operators used 2 radio vendors, in order to keep things competitive when buying more. All have exposure to Huawei to some extent in their networks.
If there are only 2 permitted credible radio vendors, then pricing on the "new" second vendor is hardly going to be competitive - where else will you go? You can't go with one vendor, and if you did, their pricing would be ramping up as well, as they know you only have one other choice.
Open RAN presents an interesting insurance policy for operators, and Vodafone UK has even announced it will build a couple of thousand sites using less prominent vendors' equipment. This will get them better pricing going forwards from their existing vendors (as there's an onboarded alternative supplier), as well as give them a new option they might wind up preferring.
Right now though, with the proprietary nature of X2 (in the real world - the standards suggest it's not proprietary, but it absolutely is proprietary), you can't deploy interoperable radios, and that keeps your vendor choice limited. If operators can run a procurement and buy a box from one of five companies, that feels a lot better for their shareholders.
Also: you know your network has lost its mind when there are 20 extra headers on an IP packet.
Press release: https://handbook.rapid.space/RS-Hyper.Open.Converged.Cloud.D...
More info on 5G technology: https://handbook.rapid.space/evangelist/RS-Presentation.For....
(disclaimer: I work for Nexedi and help out on Rapid.Space)
I work at a regional govt in Germany - we want to transition to local cloud - and think this is great product. If these 'NayuOS" can by synced to our own nextCloud installations. Could you help? Thnx
I suppose it's possible that their product includes some Open Source Software, while still using node-locked licenses. But it doesn't sound like it.
This press release [1] from 2020 makes it sound like Amarisoft is working on OpenRAN.
[1] https://apnews.com/press-release/pr-businesswire/56f3c23c33a...
Usual caveats about Part 15 vs Part 97 use apply.