Not to mention some cities will give them money if they take a bus to another city. Just shuffle the people around so it's no longer that current city's problem.
Not to mention some cities will give them money if they take a bus to another city. Just shuffle the people around so it's no longer that current city's problem.
There's a lot of evidence that expensive cities create homeless people [1, 2, 3].
[1] https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/12/14/18131047/homelessne...
[2] https://archive.curbed.com/2016/8/26/12652130/homelessness-e...
[3] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-07-06/why-is-ho...
People, particularly families, who are briefly homeless until they get the next apartment or who are on the short-list for assistance, are less mobile. There are a lot of homeless people who have a job, have a car, but just can't make it work at the moment as far as housing.
As a trucker, my view is mostly from the interstate.
The most homeless I see in my travels all over the country is I-5 in California, Oregon and Washington, and CA 99.
It's pretty cold in Washington and Oregon right now. Even California at night.
Tents, tarps, sleeping bags, on both sides of the freeway fence, or inside interchange cloverleafs.
Not judging their condition or their person, I don't know them. It looks pretty rough.
https://www.usnews.com/news/cities/slideshows/cities-with-th...
I would also be interested in per capita per city. Even more so for aggregates of cold vs warm cities overall.
NY is 22.5M
LA is 18.7M
By contrast, Sacramento was clearly not part of that unit, even though it isn’t _that_ much further away. There’s a notable gap between the cities, and the cross-commute rate was near zero. (Emphatically NOT zero, there were some people who commuted in from Sacramento, but those were rare, and I never heard of anyone commuting the other way).
Err...?