SEO: Don't Use Private Registration
markmaunder.com
markmaunder.com
I sympathize with "I made a change, something happened, this whole field feels like voodoo, please tell me my change mattered." You're trying to black-box guess emergent behavior of a very complicated algorithm. In some circumstances that's the best alternative, but for this specific issue, the weight of past experiences personally or known to me is not in your favor.
I didn't buy an expired domain.
It doesn't feel like voodoo. I've been breaking web apps since you were 12.
Aren't we all black-box guessing Google? Aren't you?
Dude, did you just call Patio11 a troll? And then claim that you've been breaking web apps since he was 12?
Just when you think you've seen it all...
No data to back up the claim. Not even a visual.
I ate a burrito for lunch today and traffic is through the roof! Must be the burrito!
Sigh.
Totally agree.
I'm currently working on a small project to replace Google Custom Search with a proper Apache Solr set up. Unfortunately the project manager heard at an SEO conference that Google punishes you for using competing in-site search products.
But I can say that it does matter.
Why?
Because for one thing a whois record with valid info is cached in various places and creates unique info which is repackaged on other websites that get slurped.
Next, we run a whois server for our registrar and it does get hit by google bot every single day.
Along the same lines the registrar you use for your domain also matters.
None of this means that you can't rank well with private registration.
But unless you've got a specific reason to have privacy on your records there is no question that it is an advantage (for seo and other reasons) to have your info public (not to mention if it's private you stand a greater chance of losing your domain name..)
May be, just may be, it's time to go to user-generated user-moderated directory of web links. Yes? or No?