This makes sense from a support point of view.
Supporting non-standard configurations costs money (both in direct and indirect ways, such as developer attention and time lost triaging bugs, etc.), they don't want to spend the money on it.
Supporting non-standard configurations costs money (both in direct and indirect ways, such as developer attention and time lost triaging bugs, etc.), they don't want to spend the money on it.
Support? Isn't this google we're talking about?
I don't think it's a reasonable expectation from US corporations so we need to take their marketing with a grain of salt.