France has passed a law protecting the sounds and smells of the countryside
edition.cnn.com
edition.cnn.com
I grew up in a village in France: the neighbor has a rooster and the house is next to a church. When I took my wife, a city dweller, to the village, she told me she couldn't sleep past 6am due to the noises from the church (bells ring at 6, then every hour) and the rooster. I am so used to it that my brain filters any rooster or church bells sound.
Maybe that's the case where you live. I've seen other places where everybody was at war with everybody else. Did you just say "idealized view of the countryside"?
Not so extreme, but I grew up bordering the country and it was very annoying sometimes. Dogs barking all night long, very difficult to filter that. Lots of flies, wasps and other bugs. And then little village big hell. Give me big city any time.
Edit: for an extreme case, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabin_fever
Back when I was living in the South, I remember meeting a few people irritated by the cicadas who were allegedly « too loud ». Imagine that.
>I remember when a storm hit the region, everyone got out, cleared the trees on the road and repaired each other houses.
Was that the 99 storm ? Back then I was in the North-East, where it was the strongest. I saw an old guy walking his dog outside and almost getting beheaded by a rogue steel sheet. I also vividly remember people daisy-chaining 100m extension chords across the village to bring electricity to the side that lost it. A lot of people were panicking because they had four freezers full of meat hidden in the basement, and a lot of them were quite poor and couldn't afford to lose those.
One day I realized that I was no longer waking up at 6AM. Either none of the 6AM flights were running anymore or I just no longer heard the noise.
And of course, the flights were still running.
To be fair, I grew up into one of the most rural part of France as did my parents and my grand parents before them and I have a vivid memory of my father killing the neighbor rooster while he was crowning at three in the morning. Roosters are dumb animals. Keeping them in settled area is asking for troubles.
I hope that this law will refrain people from going to court, which is a new habit in France.
source: https://www.ladepeche.fr/2019/05/13/ile-doleron-parce-quil-g...
I have a neighbour in my village (and I mean, really 'in') who has several cocks, and he also has peacocks! The first ones start around 2 AM, the other ones basically never stop. I leave 300 yards away and I hear everything through the double window, every night. Oh, as I said peacocks, you probably thought "that neighbour must have a large property, a real park". Yeah, no, he has a standard detached house with its small piece of land, and the hens, the cocks, the peacocks spend their time on neighbours properties: a few remaining meadows (nobody really minds) and, what is more trouble, the gardens (they ate all my cabbages one year in a garden I have even farther from their place).
Also, sometimes people complain against traditional things, but they often complain about 'industrial' size farms. Farming has changed a lot in France in 30 years (even though it still operates at much smaller scale than in countries like the USA, the sizes and modes of exploitation have dramatically changed). So people often complain about a massive pig farm, a massive poultry farm with several thousands chickens, and so on.
In my village (coming back a bit earlier in time), people used to have 1 to 4 cows in a tiny stable, and would take them to the meadows. Now the few remaining so-called agricultors have a hundred cows in a hangar (often all year long). Actually they don't have a hundred cows: they have 99 cows, because starting with the 100th, the extra cows are no more subsidised...
I grew up in the early 80s in a very small village, in a very rural area: the parents of all pupils were farmers, except mine. Cereals production was dominant, with a part of cattle and poultry.
Nowadays there are problems between farmers and non-farmers. Non-farmers will complain about farmers. Farmers will complain about the complaints from non-farmers. Which is right?
Farmers will tell that those assholes from the cities do not understand their work, that they must adapt to traditions if they come settle there, and so on. For examples, that harvesting at 2 AM is normal because it is cooler. I am sorry but this is somewhat bullshit. Or complete bullshit. When I was a kid, they would never work at night, except for a real emergency (and they didn't have air-conditioning). The truth is, that those farmers have bought a lot more land, that the surface of each farm has tripled or quadrupled, and therefore they have to harvest 3 or 4 times more in the same time period or even in less time because they have specialised in a single activity (giving up on cattle for example) and must do all their surface at the same moment instead of just a part. There is no tradition in that, it is brand new.
Also, nobody had breathing troubles because of harvesting when I was a kid. But now the harvesters are larger, faster, and they make clouds of fine dust which spread far. I am not normally asthmatic, but last times I visited there at harvest period, I had breathing problem because of that dust. Again, zero tradition there. Even with mechanised agriculture of WW2- 1980s, it was not a thing.
So the recent changes are creating true problems, and complaining about does not always mean being an intolerant entitled asshole. Those problems cannot be swept away in the name of tradition. If farmer had remained traditional in their techniques, there wouldn't be such problems and people wouldn't complain about them.
I think non farmers don't understand why they have to bear the nuisance from food production when the food can be brought from outside, and cheaper. What they loose sight of, is that being able to feed your country is a huge advantage when shit hits the fan. During wartime, food is the most important ressource there is.
Yes and no. From a country to the neighbouring countries, the average farm surface vary greatly; from an area to the next area in the same country, variations are high too; in a same municipality, we have farms which are 5 times larger than others (20 times or more if you take market gardeners into account); and yet they all sort of manage.
There is also the natural tendency of every farmer for expansion; once he's done with his stuff, he always would like to buy one of the neighbour's field, and now they are not afraid of buying/renting/using land that is tens of miles away (their fuel is subsidised too), which increases the phenomenon.
There is also the race with constant investment (and with constant debt) in order to capture subsidies and avoid taxes. There are plenty of weird incentives, sometimes pulling in the same direction, sometimes towards opposite directions.
But you can choose to play differently, more or less like it was done until the eighties, with lower investment, lower expenses. Subsidies are now directed to smaller units (above some threshold), so if your investment is low, it can compensate the relative lack of scale economy. Scaling requires lots of expenses too. But that's the way most choose: what can we tell them? "Well, good luck with that rat race?"
Actually, if we look at statistics, the smallest farms do not really disappear, it is mostly the mid-sized farms which disappear by fusing and shifting to large ones.
> I think non farmers don't understand why they have to bear the nuisance from food production when the food can be brought from outside, and cheaper.
Maybe it is common a point of view in America, but it really isn't here. (I am not saying I agree or disagree with it, but it is something which is very rarely heard here.)
> What they loose sight of, is that being able to feed your country is a huge advantage when shit hits the fan.
Well, as far as the country France is concerned, we used to produce as much or more before all those changes...
Cattle production has been going down for 25 years. It is well known that beef peaked around 1990, but other productions decreased too: pork peaked around 2000, sheep peaked already as early as 1980, more surprisingly even poultry peaked around 2000.
Surface (as a whole) is going down, while yield per surface has (expectedly) reached a ceiling after the crazy increases for 5 decades after WW2.
The agricultural balance which was the pride of the country has been collapsing for a decade or more, with a massive raise of importations, and is probably negative now if it is not saved any more by wine and booze...
Also, "smells of the countryside" gave me a good chuckle.
Fortunately, the dawn chorus is nearly deafening and brings me joy every morning.
It's been great, but now I realize that a few acres an hour from the city isn't quite enough for solitude, you're mostly in a working food factory (fair enough I suppose); if you want real quiet it seems you might need 50-100+ acres many hours away.
Went on holiday to rustic Italy. Woke up by the freaking birds before 6, so, so loud! Louder than I've ever heard birds before, thousands of insolent cheep chirp squawk. It was amazing! I was/am a city dweller and was expecting Boccherini.
Well, they are less noisy than they used to be (think of the change of noise emissions for cars, though added dampening body), but the usage is now constant.
> I realize that a few acres an hour from the city isn't quite enough for solitude, you're mostly in a working food factory (fair enough I suppose); if you want real quiet it seems you might need 50-100+ acres many hours away.
If you have meadows around, that's easier: the tractors only pays quick visits in the course of 3 days, once or twice a year, to cut/ted/make bunches of hay. Cutting grass is faster than ploughing a field, it requires less power, and less operations are needed along the year. And it smells good :) Then you have the cattle, but cattle in a meadow is not a nuisance generally.
> if you want real quiet it seems you might need 50-100+ acres many hours away.
But then you are the one who must maintain all those acres :-)
People move to be close to nature but the farmers are out spreading manure at 5:30 AM and trucks are going up and down the "quiet country lane" all day.
I usually don't, but I once had a neighbour who found it clever to spray liquid manure through the water cannons which are normally used for watering maize... I just let you imagine for a minute the atmosphere in the whole municipality when he was doing that.
It makes me want to leave France.
I think it is a very beautiful lifestyle, to be able to live away from the industrialization and closer to the nature.
Not something I'm taking anyone to court over.
Do due diligence before picking a place to live, folks.
Freight trains are probably the least bad way for freight to enter a city, given their efficiency and relative greenness. But they do need to be unloaded, maintained, and turned around somewhere, and wherever that is going to happen is going to be noisy.
I am guessing this particular incident concerns the LIRR's coach yard in the aptly-named neighborhood of Hudson Yards, or NJT/Amtrak's yard in Sunnyside. Either way, it doesn't have much to do about bringing goods into the cities. This is instead a good-old commuters-versus-residents thing.
The neighborhood in question has 1 bedrooms starting at $2.6k a month, even after COVID depressed rental prices. People are by no means being forced to live there because they have no place left to go.
California stopped having prescribed bans as frequently because they would violate air quality rules and now they have wildfires so intense they need to evacuate heavily populated areas every year. Complaining about freight noise from trains would be a net negative if what you replaced it with was an equivalent amount of trucks, which are far worse for urbanism.
Honestly, aside from a few obvious things, "due diligence" is often pretty much impossible.
If you move into an apartment in the winter, there's zero way of knowing that teens like to blare window-shakingly loud music in the park across the street every other day in the summer.
Or that the seemingly innocuous speed bump in front of your building will cause the 10's of garbage trucks that race by at maximum speed at 2 am each night to rattle and bump with such a force that each one wakes you up.
Or that a month after you move in, you get a new neighbor next door who blares bass-thumping music all day long while you're trying to work.
Or that the building next door starts to undergo gut renovation and welcome to jackhammering all day long.
Except for super-obvious stuff like is this a street with noisy bars/clubs, or yeah an active train yard -- which isn't even "due diligence" it's just keeping your eyes open -- there really isn't much you can do ahead of time. You just have to accept it'll always be a gamble.
I would assume there are certain maximum sound volume regulations in France as they exist in many places.
“tradition” is all too commonly used as an argument to break the law. I do not believe it should play a factor at all whether something happened in the past, merely whether it violate the law.
If France have nationwide rules about sound levels and the rooster exceeded them, then that is all the diligence a man needs to have done. One may certainly expect that the government upholds the law uniformly throughout one's country.
It's not as if France doesn't have issues with perceived political elitism, given the existence of the yellow vests.
If laws could be so easily ignored, we might as well do away with them.
Like, if I move somewhere where I know that the noise regulations mandate low noise after 10pm and there's a pub making a racket at midnight, of course I'm going to report it, the fact that it's been there for 200 years is literally completely irrelevant.
Lots of well meaning laws have unintended consequences. A large contributing factor to out-of-control Californian wildfires was that prescribed fires to thin the amount of combustible material were often stopped by the air quality board.
All of our industrial equipment should be designed with this in mind.
Back up beepers are considerably louder than they need to be.
Weirdly, the police sirens in Germany towns like Frankfurt are incessant - it's a very piercing sound, they use them often, all day long, and the sound bounces through the walls of the town which is 5 stories everywhere and narrow streets. In a North American city you rarely actually hear sirens - maybe for firetrucks.
The low hum of gasonline engines really adds up, the electrics are so much nicer that way but I fear accidents.
Tom Scott has a fascinating video that describes how this is changing: https://youtu.be/fa28lIGuxq8
The worst bit is that sound walls, at least the ones deployed in America, do not even really fix the problem, because they can reflect sound (so they may reduce immediate area noise but increase it farther away). You would probably want something pretty much like a tunnel.
Frankly houses for sale & rent should come with a sound recording of the last two weeks of use
Dilligence is hard as heck; who knows if there's som neighbor that habitually does carpentry at 2AM or whose dog goes apeshit a couple times a week or a delivery service va blasting it's noisemaker at 5AM.
I agree about doing due diligence but a lot is hard to account for. We are so much at the mercy of the outside world. Maybe the neighbors AC sucks & reverbs something wicked. How would a winter home buyer find that out? Or maybe it's the heater that's a problem.
And it just doesn't feel like we're in a world where people tend to be open to working together to improve things.
https://jalopnik.com/the-absurd-community-fight-that-could-c...
Short version: People move in next to an established race track and learn they don't like the sound of race tracks. You'll be shocked at what happens next!
If you want a laugh, do a Google Image search for "laguna pipes", to see the elaborate contraptions people bolt to the back of their track cars to redirect exhaust noise away from the sound meter to keep them from blowing sound.
I've never had an issue, as the car I track is quiet and stock. But plenty of stock vehicles made in the past few decades are well past the limits already, and I feel the frustration of those who used to have a "legal" car, but keep getting tripped up by the lowering and lowering of sound limits.
Overall, I simply cannot fathom those who are annoyed by the sound of the track. It's on a HUGE expanse of land. The complainers must be many hilltops away. I don't doubt the sound carries for many miles, but it's very much "background noise I choose to be angered by and whine about" versus actual nuisance.
I was at COTA for the inaugural F1 race, and had a fantastic time, and also traveled there to see Aussie V8 Supercars there.
That said, I'm not sure I'd want to drive the track in a street car. I've driven it in sims I'm not sure it's great at typical road car speeds.
At the moment, in France, the racing track of Albi, the track of which runs around the airport track, is being sued and fined for the noise. The track exists since 1960, there were only a few farms around in those days. People built beside the circuit later (building only started slowly in the 80s), and now they complain. And even now they keep on building right there, packing each empty lot with new houses!
People moved in and then the race track tried to get noise restrictions from the 1950s changed to benefit them.(increasing no-muffler days(wtf?) and opening race course on sunday)
From your linked propaganda piece:
> restrictions on use set in the 1950s.
I'd be heavily on side of people wanting a peaceful place to live than to cater to ignorant arseholes who don't want to use mufflers cos they like the sound it makes.
Oh that’s going to go over well. Some people in my neighborhood tried suing and now we have every train blowing their horns through this entire section of the city. A dozen times a day and many of those at night.
It’s hard for me to not laugh at my neighbors every time it happens.
https://www.bjtonline.com/business-jet-news/runway-removal-t...
Further expansion was approved in 2018, when one of the local MPs — Boris Johnson, who had promised to "lie down in front of bulldozers" to prevent expansion — was conveniently on a trip abroad during the vote it Parliament.
(The areas of London overflown are a mix of wealthy, average and poor-ish, left-voting and right-voting, it's far too large an area to wave away as X group of people complaining.)
Made worse because well off areas tend to be in the hills, and so planes are lower over the ground.
Do your due diligence when developing industrial properties, folks.
Because I was always wondering how that would go
Hudson Yards completely caps the yard over with buildings so I don’t think you can hear it at all.
In that context, such a law makes complete sense, I guess.
If you want to see the non-theme park France feel free to ask, I can give you the address of my favourite kebab in a 70's style banlieue dortoir, you'll love it.
Often the population is not growing, it just wastes a lot more space, and does it in a relatively ugly way. As the condition of the historical village degrades, it also becomes ugly. At my place, the population keeps decreasing, it is down to only one fifth of what it once was, and yet the spread accelerates.
For foreigners: just fool around Google Maps and StreetView, to have a look at the spread around many village kernels, and at the village entrances.
A random starting point (one in many thousands): https://www.google.fr/maps/@43.4947119,0.923205,1184m/data=!...
Look at the spread (as more or less organised areas, but also along roads). Then try to find the historical village limits, see how small it was compared to now. Well, the number of inhabitants was about the same as now.
Whomever is financing the Cato institute is completely irrelevant to the argument made.
Had I not cited the source, would you have actually considered the point?
What?
Pig manure.
There is no smell like that.
I love the smell of pig manure in the morning.
...
It smells like bacon.
[The disclaimer is longer than comment, but here goes nothing]
... This sounds like it might result in unexpected and undesirable outcomes. Are rural French communities really so invariant over time and space that you can set their community standards in stone?