Turkey has around 80milion people as its population and an elected government. I think these people have the right to summon an ambassador from not just twitter but all big tech giants.
Isn't it a bit of an admission though? Global corps are effectively as powerful as most nation-states now, to the point you need "ambassadors". I expect the next step will be to agree on a Geneva-like convention on this sort of diplomatic mission, where the local representative is guaranteed immunity in exchange for accepting equal representation of a country in the corporation.
Isn't it better to admit it than to not do anything about it?
They weren't just embassies, and the 'ambassadors' weren't just representing the companies, these are state censorship bureaus.
Does the "ambassador of Twitter" has diplomatic immunity, or they can send the ambassador to hail if Twitter breaks a local law?