I might not be able to read this 10 years from now so I'm not going to read it now.
Bizarre argument. Seems like something you don't need to worry about but whatever floats your boat
Bizarre argument. Seems like something you don't need to worry about but whatever floats your boat
It's a presponse to "my site is js; if you don't like it, leave it!"
Curl isn't even that great to archive with anyway is it? wget --mirror used to be the hotness.
I think it's a valid point to raise, but how much you care about it is going to depend hugely on what you're doing.
Obviously if a company wants tight control over their content then this may work to their benefit - although they may still find that their ability to render their own content requires non-trivial maintenance over time.
But that's a pretty narrow view of the web, and not everyone publishing on the web fits that model.