Exactly how is it an exaggeration? I cannot fathom how anyone can not interpret that as a call for more censorship.
I can 100% understand how some people can conflate "deplatforming" with censorship (there is an argument to be made that they're the same thing), but this isn't calling for deplatforming.
It specifically states: deplatforming has been done, but what we actually really need is these 4 extra (non-censorship-related) things.
I'm curious to hear an explanation of how either of the following 4 things are censorship:
1. advertising transparency
2. selection algorithm transparency
3. algorithmic boosting of fact-checked sources
4. funding academic research into the impact of online platforms