>Personally, I'd rather see a more aggressive AGPL where REST calls are considered linking and trigger virality
That's why I never understood the point of SSPL. Is this exactly what AGPLv3 is supposed to be for?
That's why I never understood the point of SSPL. Is this exactly what AGPLv3 is supposed to be for?
I believe AGPL expands the definition of distribution not of linking. So if GCC was AGPL and I made a web page where you could upload source code and then download the binary, that would count as "distributing" GCC and thus I would have to make the changes I made available (because privately made change to GPL code do not have to be shared if the binaries aren't shared).