* https://www.uniqlo.com/us/en/men-hybrid-down-parka-429290.ht...
* https://www.canadagoose.com/ca/en/mens-bromley-black-label-b...
* https://www.gucci.com/us/en/pr/men/ready-to-wear-for-men/out...
* https://www.uniqlo.com/us/en/men-hybrid-down-parka-429290.ht...
* https://www.canadagoose.com/ca/en/mens-bromley-black-label-b...
* https://www.gucci.com/us/en/pr/men/ready-to-wear-for-men/out...
Uniqlo is one of the few stores I'll shop from because they don't have the the logos and are decent quality for the price.
I guess I should clarify my statement to be that the more gratuitous a logo, the less I think of the quality of the product. For example, I imagine Gucci is trying to cash in on its name, or people wanting to show off their willingness to spend money rather than it being a good jacket.
In a sense, Gucci and Vitton are what low class people think rich people wear. Kind of like Trump thinks being rich is shitting in gold toilets.
Of course, this contempt of "tacky luxury" is in itself a form of signaling among a certain class.