> We can also have dogs "put to sleep" but not people.
It's not like this is without controversy; it's an active political battle.
It's not like this is without controversy; it's an active political battle.
Very different than "putting down" terminally ill people on their own choice and action.
Tho, maybe similar to the eugenic endeavors of the past. I hope you're not implying that's what's in debate again.