Maybe the extreme power savings are more of an aesthetic thing for them.
Maybe the extreme power savings are more of an aesthetic thing for them.
https://www.google.com/search?q=bimini+top+solar+panel&clien...
What could be trivially easy to mount on a small off grid cabin in the woods somewhere, like two of these:
https://www.altestore.com/store/solar-panels/panasonic-hit-h...
could be very difficult and too much surface area and wind loading on a sailboat that people can realistically afford to buy. If you have the space and can fit one, something like the Sunpower 400W rated panels which are composed of expensive, ultra high efficiency monocrystalline Si cells would be ideal. You're looking for the greatest ratio of watts per square meter in STC test conditions.
What I would recommend is first calculating the watt-hours per day consumed by your projected load, versus what the PV system could be expected to produce.
I dont know. The calculation of kWh checks out to be 100ah x 48v = 4800wh. And for lead acid 200ah x 12v x 2= 4800wh.
What do you suggest or is there something I am thinking incorrectly... space is not an issue BTW.
4 x 12V 200Ah isn't big enough for most houses, unless it's like a cabin in the woods somewhere. and you're right that the cycle life of those and cost is high.
but commercial li-ion based solutions are also expensive. However, if you can keep them at 80-85% state of charge, and rarely if ever discharge them below 30%, they should have lifespans 5-6x longer than the lead acid solution.
in either solution you can't really consider the full volts * Ah capacity of the battery to be usable. If you were to ever use all of the watt-hours in a 12V 200Ah battery you'd kill it, you never want to go below 20% state of charge... so to be conservative the actual capacity of a single battery is something like:
12 * 200 = 2400 Wh, then (2400 * 0.70) = 1680Wh.
This is cheaper than an Apple laptop.
A quarter of the price paid is shipping since it comes directly from China so source price is already under $100/kWh.
A recent test by Will Prowse:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U4ZfQ_IToI
$433 280Ah LiFePO4 Cells Tested: Cheaper than lead acid!
Many people have the same good experience with these kind of cells:
Added: 14 kWh will run a 20 Watt laptop for a month.
My partner and I live aboard a 41ft sailboat and both work remotely as programmers. I installed 1920w of solar on the boat and get approximately 3.5-4.5kwh per day in output, depending on which way we are oriented while at anchor. I installed 600ah of LiFePO4 batteries @ 12v and when combined with that amount of solar, we have pretty much all the power we need. We frequently cook with an air fryer and have a dishwasher on the boat that we run daily-- all off solar.
I chose one (after sending a few private message to forum members) but I'm not recommanding it until I get and test my batteries.
But LFP batteries have gotten really cheap, so the price for a mistake is no longer prohibitive.
It further appears that my statement "high efficiency panels are typically semi-flexible without the frame" is inaccurate- they are typically not reasonably described as semi-flexible, even without the frame and coating.
Monocrystalline by definition is not flexible, you're referring to thin films (cadmium telluride or amorphous silicon or other)
Is there any middle ground?
Is Sunpower's claim of 22-25% efficient monocrystalline semi-flexible panels not to be believed? Have I been fooled by the marketing? Are these thin film panels? Nothing I can find online suggests this is a dubious claim, but it's possible I'm simply failing to find correct information.
(Just a random idea, I know absolutely nothing about boats :)
Sure wish I had a million dollars sitting around when the ship went on sale for $280k. And a couple more friends with free time & well-equipped workshops.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29428/the-experimental...
From the article:
> Our work schedule is tied to the weather, as we depend on solar energy to power our computers.
So, what's the problem then? Well, they've written in-depth about the challenges and constraints of solar elsewhere on the site. [1]
Their vessel is on the smaller side of the spectrum. There's only so much usable space to place a solar array. [2] They do use batteries and they have a small gas generator, but those are also limited and only used as a backup.
[1] https://100r.co/site/off_the_grid.html#power [2] https://100r.co/site/pino.html
This is in the middle of a city in the United States.
I've tried generators and have gone through 3 so far. Fuel was very expensive, and the time and effort to keep them running 24/7 was miserable. I have now tried going solar but have had all sorts of problems with battery life and cloudy weather. It's not as easy as I thought it would be.
.. how? Which city?
You must have some idea of why they are obstructing though, right? An electrical permit is an indirect block, so I'm guessing you've fought other battles with the office in the past?
In any case, you have a right to file the permit. The office might make your life hell through documented denials or overzealous inspections, but getting the permit filed should be non-controversial. Once filed, they must approve or deny. If denied, there is a formal appeals process which can run through different people/departments. If you have the time and energy for it, of course.
Anyway, I know you are not here soliciting advice, but my next step would be to bring a lawyer to the filing office to ensure that the application is filed, and that no further assault occurs. Good luck.
I do feel like part of the problem is they don't actually want to give me anything in writing.
I've got a scheduled meeting with the mayor, my lawyer, the fire marshal, and the main zoning officer on the 21st of this month.
That sounds like a reasonable guess to me.
If there is some personal animosity, or they have a friend who runs a potential competitor/lost on the purchase bid/etc, or somesuch other corrupt motivations ... then their only real power is to exhaust you.
Once you have a live permit application, you're in the system and the legal process takes over. They can still hit you hard on process and code conformity, but it takes greater coordination to do so.
Again, good luck. Petty corruption is sometimes the worst kind.
Their science museum kinda sucks, and their "maker space" is a laser cutter tacked onto the incubator as an afterthought.
The building I bought is 220,000 sqft and I'm passionate about doing all the things that tax is supposed to pay for, but I didn't know this at the time.
If I fail and nobody notices then everything is fine for them. But if I succeed, people might wonder what the tax went to if I don't get some of it, and I'm sure it's all already spoken for.
The thing is, I don't even care about that money. I just want to do my own thing without interference.
You can subsist on PV alone but there are far better options, especially when available PV area is so limited.
They live on a boat, by the sea, often in the middle of the ocean.
Even with solar panel, extreme power saving is a necessity.