The businesses in question found it to be bad business to keep the president on their platform so they removed him. They aren’t being altruistic.
Get down to brass tacks so we can see if the argument holds up.
Seems very unlikely to me. Trump draws massive traffic to Twitter.
It has nothing to do with any market.
Maybe we'll get lucky and find that they were wrong, and that this move causes enough public backlash to give other social networks a chance to thrive (if we're really lucky, maybe even decentralized ones!)
The only information we have is that it was internal pressure too be a "better company."