I started reading this in the smug knowledge that I knew it already, that I wasn't wrong about 230.

But then I saw this passage:

> The "user" protections get less attention, but they're right there in the important 26 words. "No provider or __user__ of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker...." That's why there are cases like Barrett v. Rosenthal where someone who forwarded an email to a mailing list was held to be protected by Section 230, as a user of an interactive computer service who did not write the underlying material that was forwarded.

I didn't know that! I guess I was wrong about Section 230 :)