Every idea which moves society forward starts out as an idea first believed to be false. If we censor what we believe to be false, we stop right here - progress halts.
This is a flimsy, oversimplified, and false argument. It stands in stark contrast to the depth of thought discussed in the paper.
I disagree.
The invention (or discovery) of multiplication moved society forward. Was multiplication considered false before then?
Many other times, society often takes its time at recognizing, accepting, and implementing the true ideas.
If my FALSEHOOD had been censored, I would still be walking around with a dumb idea in my head.