There's probably a scenario where the Indian courts claim that being able to access it whatsoever within the country means they haven't complied with the order (ie. VPN-based access), but this is probably more because it's easier for Legal to hit 'ban account' than do the work of asking engineers to implement geo-based account bans (this is assuming there aren't already geo-based account bans on Twitter; I can't find any reference to one).

But reading from the article it is at least clear that the Courts "rejected" a request to ban Sci-Hub and instead gave time to the Scientific community to figure out a way forward. I don't see where you get that the Court in India was in favour of banning Sci-Hub.

Quoting:

"In December, academic publishers Elsevier, Wiley, and the American Chemical Society filed a suit with the Delhi High Court, asking Indian internet service providers to block Sci-Hub and similar site Libgen. The court rejected the publishers’ requests that the sites be blocked immediately, instead declaring it an “issue of public importance” and allowing time for the scientific community to weigh in."