I can read quite clearly between the lines of your comment, but I’m still having trouble finding where in my comment I said that users calling for violence on social media should be exempt from sanctions if they’re left-leaning.
Unless I misunderstood it this statement implies that a window smashing person would as well attack another humane being. It's not true. These acts are different, require different motivations and a different mentality/personality traits to follow through.
...if you attempt to stop them from smashing said window it is likely, yes. This happened a few times in USA in the past few months.
The acts are obviously different, if they were the same we would not have this discussion.
Have you ever seen Antifa in action?
It's a bad faith argument you're arguing against, which I'm sure you see, just want to call it out.
Why should anyone engage with your arguments when they are easily debunked both on principle, and with evidence widely available online? Why should anyone engage with your arguments when they are made in bad faith?
More to the point, can you demonstrate that you aren't trolling?
Justifying around the "greater good" is so obviously fraught and subjective.
And since the workers in tech are overwhelmingly liberal, they will undoubtedly bias policies of mass communication platforms to disallow opposition.
Oddly enough people so concerned with minority representation will steam-roll minorities when they make blind "greater good" majoritarianism the norm.
And nowadays the definition of "harm" has been trivialized so far that really practically anything is a target.