Many Telegram users are away of it's quirks and how it operates differently to other IMs. Any tool will do damage in the hands of a bad workman.
A good way to infer Telegram is reliable is how many despotic tyrants and corrupt countries ban it.
Many Telegram users are away of it's quirks and how it operates differently to other IMs. Any tool will do damage in the hands of a bad workman.
A good way to infer Telegram is reliable is how many despotic tyrants and corrupt countries ban it.
That's false. Encrypted messages aren't searchable by third-parties. End-to-end encrypted messages are searchable by only the communicating parties regardless of where they're stored.
There's also the issue of mirroring by third-parties, but then we're talking about data in transit versus at rest, your backup methods, and so forth. (And I don't have time to get into that this morning.)
Telegram is used a lot in developing countries which are using phones made 3-7 years ago. Or phones that are made recently but with old chips and tech. Maintaining a search index across literally millions or billions (some groups are really really big) messages isn't something your phone can reasonably do.
I do wish telegram was e2ee for IMs, but for groups and super groups and channels I don't particularly care.
Of course there are people who are much more popular than me, so it might be possible and I am not aware of it. :)
https://t.me/durovschat Has 9500 members
https://t.me/swhkdemocracy Has 6000 members
https://t.me/linux_group Has 6000 members
https://t.me/PublicTestGroup Has 18000 members
There is no limit to joining these chats. These design decisions Telegram has picked has allowed the app to be quasi social media, rather than just IM. You can't index these and maintain chat history locally. You'd need way more bandwidth and energy and computational power than the average cellphone has.
That's probably true, but a significant proportion of users are not, and do not realize that their chats are not encrypted. It's no surprise either, given that security is one of the core things that Telegram markets itself on -- unfairly so, in my opinion.
Source: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1560501/1/Abu-Salma%20...
No, this only tells you that it's used en mass in those countries.
E.g. Whatsapp has now taken the place of telegram in Iran but it's still not banned. Despite literally everyone using it.
Whatsapp didn't win many users, even when Telegram was banned in Russia for months.
Telegram even worked in Belarus despite the whole internet shutting down there. [3]
[1] - https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/19/whatsapp-blocked-in-brazil...
[2] - https://www.theverge.com/2015/12/17/10386776/brazil-whatsapp...
[3] - https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-08-21/telegr...
Pretty much what I said.