The 20% to 60% is meant to demonstrate female inequality in India, because most of them are working at home for zero pay and low social status. Whereas in more developed countries, women get paid to work in industries.
To put it another way, if we just take the former metric as the gold measure it is better to be payed to care for someone else's children than to not be payed to care for your own.
I'm struggling to see any honest point in this comment.
Are you trying to say that the 60% of Chinese women includes women who are homemakers and aren't in the workforce as it is defined?
The fact is only 20% of women are not getting paid for their labor. It’s a sign of huge lack of development progress
I agree with you that this shouldn’t be the case, but right now it absolutely is the case in India.
Nobody reasonable assumes that women not counted in labor participation statistics are partying on the moon :-)
I.e.: we already knew what he's saying.