We tested a tool to confuse Google’s ad network. It works and you should use it
technologyreview.com
technologyreview.com
It's AdNauseam. I would use it if I wasn't afraid of Google terminating my Google Account, which I heavily depend on, for now.
>AdNauseam is like conventional ad-blocking software, but with an extra layer. Instead of just removing ads when the user browses a website, it also automatically clicks on them. By making it appear as if the user is interested in everything, AdNauseam makes it hard for observers to construct a profile of that person. It’s like jamming radar by flooding it with false signals. And it’s adjustable. Users can choose to trust privacy-respecting advertisers while jamming others. They can also choose whether to automatically click on all the ads on a given website or only some percentage of them.
There can be no singular choice that allows us what we want as individuals and what we need as a group. By now, most of us understand that advertising is one way to monitize online content, but the fact is that some companies who use advertising have taken their efforts far beyond anything reasonable. Sites with popovers, moving elements, content replacement, failure to load without JavaScript, blinking, annoying, trolling with imagery, you name it the ad market has done it to us.
So, we're suppose to accept advertising as some legitimate ad model because...why?
Now subscriptions are interesting, but if the article content is only accessible through subscription, then how does the search for that content work?
Advertising.
From a link shared on a public news aggregation site, I would expect the content to be publicly available as well (or at least some kind of indicator in the title)