Show HN: Collection of free illustrations like undraw
vektors.pro
vektors.pro
And some have been incorrectly tagged with both "CC" and "No attribution required but appreciated" e.g. https://www.vektors.pro/illustration-packs/saly-3d-illustrat...
Or there are some with custom licenses that have been left untagged, with just a "Get for free" CTA. e.g. https://www.vektors.pro/illustration-packs/onboarding-illust...
Taking 5 seconds to download the resource and open Licence.txt reveals:
> ...You do not have rights to redistribute, resell, lease, license, sub-license or offer this resource to any third party «as is». If you want to use this resource as a part of a product intended to be sold via any marketplace, please contact the author of the freebie to get an extended license...
If you want to be sloppy with distributing your own work and just want Product Hunt points, fair enough. But if you are distributing other people's, then at least make sure it's done right.
e.g. https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fba626e86ad1be131127616/5fc... on https://www.vektors.pro/illustration-packs/b-w-illustrations
Maybe it could be argued that this is fair use, but why not just go the extra mile and do it properly?
> We try to keep the license info as simple and accurate as possible.
If the licensing information was "simple and accurate" there wouldn't be an issue. It's missing, misleading or incorrect in many cases.
And on the subject of content removal, this is from https://www.vektors.pro/privacy-policy
> If you find any link on our Website that is offensive for any reason, you are free to contact and inform us any moment. We will consider requests to remove links, but we are not obligated to or so or to respond to you directly.
How are creators supposed to contact you? There are no "proper" contact details in the header, footer, terms and conditions or privacy policy, just a Twitter link.
This is 100% incorrect and not what fair use means, ask a lawyer.
> We will still insert the license going forward as it makes it more simpler and straightforward.
It's also legally required, and for many licenses (most CC licenses) you not only need to somehow include the license but also attribution.
I know very well how CC works, and if you would please read the link you yourself posted, you will understand that the way you are using these images clearly does not fall under fair use, as a compilation/library of anything whether that's images or songs or movies or whatever is not "news reporting, teaching, [or] parody" -- what these examples all have in common is that you're creating a derivative work ON TOP of the original work, which is why it's "fair use".
Tag line: "Find awesome free illustration packs for all your projects."
The first pack I clicked on (https://www.vektors.pro/illustration-packs/open-source-illus...)
Contains at least 3 trademarks(Nintendo, Marvel, and Sega), and you'd be opening yourself up to a lawsuit if you used them in a commercial endeavor.
Full disclosure: I just know this site via HN