Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
fiftytwo.in
fiftytwo.in
The Kazi was the head of Rumtek Monastery which is not a simple achievement [1]. He subsequently led the formation of the Sikkim National Congress and was then the first Chief minster of Sikkim for 5 years. He was awarded the Padma Vibushan, the second highest civilian honor by India. But the Kazi is reduced to the status of a noble brute in the article who just utters two sentences: "marry me" and "ignore my wife". The Chogyal gets a bit more ink but as an instrument of his wife who glamorized Sikkim, was a probably CIA/State department plant but was not on the scene for more than a dozen years.
This story would have been very different if written by a Sikkimese or an Indian not beholden to Western framing. Digging deeper, the author is Indian but her bio states: "Write on social justice, gender, culture. Medienbotschafter Fellow. Reporting Grant by European Journalism Centre. Reporting Fellow at Dart Center, Columbia University".
Schooled in the West and bringing civilization to the natives.
Such a perspective would not flow from the pen of a western (read: non-indic) author in today's day and age. But plains Indians have an romanticizing gaze towards inhabitants of the Himalayan ranges. They view them as simpler nomads. The author applies a version of the "Oriental gaze" to Sikkim's political struggle and attributes the kinetics to the two western woman in their midst - one who was just 19 and on the scene for barely a dozen years. This reduces the natives and the major participants - both educated, one highly - as mere appendages of the two western women in the mix. You don't find this highly incredulous?
Much better than the current headline and marketing driven administration in present day India, plunging India down the rabbit hole of spiralling economic decline and for the sake of elections and power creating a divided India with Hindu agenda (appeasing majority).
That’s in a completely different league when it comes to authoritarianism.
The current PM just keeps winning large electoral victories and is passing laws that benefit his ideology. And sometimes in ways that circumvents the constitution of India.
I think there is a difference.
> brought Sikkim into democratic fold removing the monarchy
She also de-democratized India through the emergency and became a near-monarch in her time in power.
> spiralling economic decline
Indira Gandhi was the leader during majority of India's biggest decline during the 1980s. It led to India going entirely bankrupt, begging the IMF for money and being coerced into liberalization.
____________
Indira Gandhi was an IronLady with accomplishments that deserve respect, but her failings with regards to sectarian violence, economy and soft authoritarianism are quite well known and well accepted.
edit: changed phrasing to less inflammatory
<Shows in great details Indira Gandhi was a real Ironlady>
Would you hail me as an 'Ironlady' if I were to overwhelm you by force?
<who brought Sikkim into democratic fold removing the monarchy>
What is this category of democracy that you extol? I find it ironical that you would label as a win for the spread of democracy the forceful takeover of an independent kingdom.
Today the western democracy is existing by forceful takeover of independent kings and kingdoms, where minority rules through the tyranny of power and weapons.
If you read the history you will know that over 75% of population in Sikkim wanted self governance, India just helped through that transition and prevented minority to be ruled by force.
Is that so? Now I'm left wondering what world you are living in.
<If you read the history you will know that over 75% of population in Sikkim wanted self governance, India just helped through that transition and prevented minority to be ruled by force.>
Self governance, by India. How does one miss that? smh
> This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (December 2018)
If this isn't irony, I don't know what is…
> In November 2010 [...] received an injunction from the court of Sikkim again banning the film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe067r5X-s
Also, having now watched the whole film, I couldn't quite fathom why it was banned in the first place!
British stitched 545+ Independent Kingdoms to create India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company