And what a beauty it is! How many languages can you do the same thing in so many different, humorous ways? Each one expresses somehow the nature of the programmer who wrote them. Haskell is the art of computer programming at some of its finest.
And what a beauty it is! How many languages can you do the same thing in so many different, humorous ways? Each one expresses somehow the nature of the programmer who wrote them. Haskell is the art of computer programming at some of its finest.
On the other hand, it also makes for an often frustrating experience of "this would be so much simpler/easier if it were Haskell or at least had x", where x could be algebraic data types, higher order types, Monads, Applicative Functors, dependent types, laziness, and so on and so on...
EDIT: Addendum: Rust scratches some of that itch and seems more and more accepted in the workforce world, so at least that's a good direction we're moving towards.
I don’t know if any of those things are practical but some are useful and some make money ;)
OCaml is also instructive. It’s a little more similar to “industry languages” but definitely close to Haskell; it also has reasonably broad adoption.
Your parents (and the older version of you) that are facing the 33%+ probability of running out of money in old age will agree that solving such a problem is most definitely not a fool's errand.
Otherwise fully agree.