From microops to abstract resources: constructing simpler CPU performance models

arxiv.org

37 pointsmatt_d3 comments

Interesting paper, but I noticed a couple of typos:

* ntel in the conclusion

* x96 in the main body

(in case the paper authors read this commentary)

x96 has been used in context of x64 + x32 architectures

I have never seen that term be used in this way before, nor can I find any references on that. Do you have links to be able to justify this claim?