Rarely does a man enter into the legal profession without being affected by the mental disease called morality.
Courts are extremely arbitrary and very often “find a way”.
What about the inconsistency of courts?
That's why higher courts exist
(Ten posts later) That's why we choose to offload most decision-making responsibilities to others.
What if we disagree with those decisions?
It depends on how seriously you disagree; the answer thus somewhere between run for office and ultimately you have to accept the limitations of cumulative representation.
Where does the good old invasion and forcibly upending the entire society fit in?
End poverty, then everyone's is on equal footing.
Imagine if the authors of this app and Apple had equal legal/media/effective power.