If there's an actual benefit to be had here, Gensim could add it as an option - but would likely always default to the same CBOW behavior as in `word2vec.c` (& similarly, FastText) - rather than this 'koan' variant.
The `koan` CBOW change has mixed effects on benchmarks, and makes their implementation no longer match the choices of the original, canonical `word2vec.c` release from the original Google authors of the word2vec paper. (Or, by my understanding, the CBOW mode of the FastText code.)
So all the reasoning in that issue for why Gensim didn't want to make any change stands. Of course, if there's an alternate mode that offers proven benefits, it'd be a welcome suggestion/addition. (At this point, it's possible that simply using the `cbow_mean=0` sum-rather-than-average mode, or a different starting `alpha`, matches any claimed benefits of koan_CBOW.)
What if that's the real reason for their sometimes slightly-better, sometimes slightly-worse performance on some benchmarks? Perhaps there are other changes, too.
This is why I continue to think Gensim's policy of matching the reference implementations from the original authors, at least by default, is usually the best policy – rather than using an alternate interpretation of the often-underspecified papers.
This is another paper that's basically just about some details of word2vec and GloVe and their effects on the results:
Improving Distributional Similarity with Lessons Learned from Word Embeddings - ACL Anthology https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Q15-1016/