It is less that the rules are vague than that the rules are whatever Apple says they are today, for you.
Apple was promoting Amphetamine not that long ago:
Apple was promoting Amphetamine not that long ago:
FWIW, it's a net downside for me that my professional workstation has an app named "Amphetamine", so I'm quietly in favor of a rename. But it's obviously the author's prerogative to choose its branding, so long as it falls within (consistently) applied policies of those who they rely on to distribute it.
I'd have to see a documented event of this happening rather than a hypothetical scenario to believe a downside actually exists.
Like they said, doc or it didn't happen.
Most corporate PCs are windows. On a fraction of the macs users are allowed to install their own software, on a tiny fraction of those amphetamine is installed, on a tiny fraction of a fraction of those maybe someone exists who has a problem with HR.
I'm not sure the last subset actually exists in the real world nor that we ought to support censorship to help imaginary people deal with imaginary morons.