Jair Bolsonaro: Organized Crime and Corruption 2020 Person of the Year
occrp.org
occrp.org
It is true that his son has been accused of hiring "phantom" employees, but to say it was on Bolsonaro's behalf is pure speculation, in fact there are zero corruption charges against him. I personally find the whole Hunder Biden episode to be a lot more damning than that and I am not ready to say Joe Biden deserves to be held responsible for it.
It is also worth noting there is no "OCCRP" award against Lula, former Brazil's president, who was in fact tried, charged, and imprisioned through a lengthy and fair judicial process - that really makes you question the true motives of this award. Are speculations more important than the due process of the law?
[0] https://veja.abril.com.br/brasil/preso-do-pcc-o-pt-tinha-dia...
https://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/segunda-turma-do-stf-mantem-...
Yes, that indeed happened. But, of course, the person responsible for that harshness was already expelled from the government, and it's on the process of undoing all of his modifications.
Also, no drug lord considered to an “organized crime” relevance award?
This “award” is just a statement about the opinion of those behind it of which places took a turn for the worst this year. It is a political opinion as important /unimportant as any opinion article written by any of those supporting organizations. It is not a thought out selection with objective criteria. Just a way to influence society opinion. Which is ok btw, just not something worth taken as definite judgement about who was the more influential person in corruption and organized crime in 2020.
An impressive feat.
Sadly,
> “It’s hard to choose. There are so many worthy candidates,” said OCCRP co-founder Paul Radu. “Corruption is a growth industry.”
Ukraine?
Attempting to subvert the democratic process?
Pardoning people accused of war crimes - without due process?
Pardoning people accused of corruption on his behalf - Manafort, Flynn, Stone.
Continuously spending federal money on his own properties without being subject to any regulation or oversight?
Asking for the arrests of his political rivals etc. etc.
If you say "ahh but where is the conviction" don't be naive - how do you charge a sitting president.
Not in a court.
During the proceedings no one ever actually argued he didn't do it they just aren't going to vote against their own man.
> "Attempting to subvert the democratic process" is terminology that doesn't mean anything
Poor argument.
The NED and Open Society are well known tools of regime change.
Which one?
Jesus christ, the HN groupthink on matters like this is so naive - of course there's an agenda, everything and everyone has an agenda.